Dove’s newest viral video “film,” Onslaught is making the rounds. In case you haven’t seen it, it’s certainly well worth the 1 minute and 15 second time investment. Check it out here.
But, poor Onslaught is getting shredded by the feminist blogosphere, and yesterday even some of my very, very faves like Jill over at Feministe and Two Knives… had at it — both making extremely good points. So good that I agreed with them 90% of the time.
Yes, there is obviously some pretty disturbing inconsistency going down for unilever to celebrate women’s “real beauty” on one hand and then sell skin whitening creams and hawk cologne with those outrageously offensive Axe commercials on the other.
And yes, they are still selling beauty products.
And yes, they are only using these new messages for the same old reason — to make money. Without a doubt. This is just another attempt to reach consumers — women.
But, isn’t it a good attempt? I mean, at the end of the day, Dove is NOT contributing to the clutter so aptly depicted in Onslaught — one less trashy ad is one less trashy add.
Plus, there may be value added here — sure, us smart-as-whips feminist types read the Beauty Myth a decade (or two) ago and we’ve seen all three of the Killing Us Softly films, so we “get” this already. But my mother and dept. secretary both watched it and said the same thing - “wow.” My little sister (who is 15) will see this video and may very well talk about this nonsense with her friends for the first time (she and I don’t talk about this issue much — very touchy subject for us both, I think). The profundity of the beauty industry and the lies it sells are still news to many people — and, alas, a 75 second visual representation of this will reach many more people (literally, in that it will find them, and figuratively, in that it will be meaningful for them) than The Beauty Myth ever has. So, I appreciate it for that. If capitalism keeps the conversation alive, so be it.
Even more, the campaign for real beauty makes me want to buy Dove to make a point for Madison Avenue. Women like this shtick, fellas. If this kind of advertising builds brand loyalty, others will use it too. Now that wouldn’t suck. No ma’am.
But I understand if some people bristle at the smug insincerity of it all, I just wish we would devote our energy taking aim at other companies, who are so much more disturbing. It’s one thing not to fall for the ads, it’s another thing to call out Dove or boycott them.
I think it would be more meaningful to stop grumbling about Dove and get on Victoria’s Secret’s ass for selling with “perfection” or on Skyy Vodka’s ass for sexist BS, or any limitless number of other companies - we have bigger fish to fry. Epic fish. Moby Dick fish.
Having said all that — I agree very much with TwoKnives on her frustration with the tag line at the end of Onslaught - “Talk to your daughter before the beauty industry does.” That’s just crazy. As in mammoth cop out, completely removed from reality, crazy.
Indivdiual ”solutions”? Did they watch their own film???
As if my conversations with my daughter could ever somehow protect her from the cultural catastrophe that she will be sold as she wades through this world! How I wish it would be that simple. I mean really, for christ’s sake I teach this crap and know it’s all fake (nicely illustrated, of course in Dove’s first “film” Evolution — another good investment of 75 seconds) and ridiculous, but I STILL can’t enjoy being in a bathing suit in the way that men do or try on jeans without feeling like it would all be so much better if I could just lose that 5 or 10 pounds. Truly. Knowledge has limits — if it didn’t no one would smoke of eat french fries. (gasp. “What - these aren’t good for me?”). I know, I say this all the time - and from within the walls of the academy, appalling.
So, I do hate the tag line. In fact, I’d like to see if anyone wants to offer up something better. Hmm… Little girl sees all that crap, walks away with a big group of friends. How about…
“Together, I know we can change this” or maybe “Why on EARTH do people do that to themselves” or maybe some stats about the beauty industry or some info about consumer rights orgs.
I guess I shouldn’t worry about Dove though, because no matter what we’re out here saying - this film is circulating like wildfire and I didn’t have Dove on my mind yesterday. A viral video coup if there ever was one.
Two Knives
October 4, 2007 | 8:21 am1
Funny, most people agree 100 percent with me ALL of the time.
Last night I laid awake in bed thinking about this damn video. Part of me really hates to be so critical because of the same great points you make — isn’t something better than nothing?
I don’t know the answer.
For the record, I don’t want to go after Dove. There are other corps that need our attention. Dove just happens to put itself out there.
A new tagline might be to give some information on a good organization working to combat the sexualization of girls — CCFC comes to mind. But not a Unilever-created foundation. Otherwise it still looks like just another ad.
The Secret Ingredient
October 4, 2007 | 1:06 pm2
It is sort of like Phillip Morris putting out the “quit smoking” ads…..but as you said, it is better than nothing. How about a tag line something like “live the way you want your daughter to live” (although I guess that still places no onus on Dove). We ALL stress about bathing suit season, trying on jeans, etc., but then want/expect our daughters to somehow be different. Is there any solution?????
blue milk
October 5, 2007 | 8:05 am3
Great, great post! I really like this ad too and while I think it’s fair to point out its flaws (we shouldn’t be mindless just cos it’s pitching our message), I don’t want to get bogged down in nit-picking when there are much, much bigger beauty campaign fish out there to fry.
I’m desperate for some sign of mainstream awareness of this problem and I’ll take what I can get. I’m very pleased with this ad and I agree with your point that this will reach a lot of people who won’t be reading The Beauty Myth anytime soon.
wwwmama
October 5, 2007 | 8:52 pm4
I love this post. And I like the video. I agree that it’s better than nothing. It’s sort of like the gap red campaign thing as far as I’m concerned. Who cares if it makes profit for someone, as long as it’s doing some good too? If ad campaigns like this work, more companies will use them, and it’s a sign that people are waking up about this issue. As a mom of a very young girl, I find myself already working against the negative images out there in how I relate to her. It’s not all up to individuals, as you say, but still, it ain’t a bad message to have out there that we should talk to our kids about this stuff. I’m not dumb enough not to recognize that it’s all a sales pitch, but it’s one I can appreciate a bit more than your typical ad fare.
BTW, I’ve found that giving your little girl a big belly kiss daily and telling her how much you love it while dancing wildly with her to her favorite music is a great way to start immunizing her against the beauty myth.
Ringo
October 8, 2007 | 9:55 pm5
This campaign makes me think of all of the green-washing companies engage in to stake their environmental claim in the ground, regardless of past misdeeds and the fact that their bottom line is still their bottom line, Mother Earth be damned. I like that companies are starting to think green (or in Dove’s case, pro-women), but the questions lie in how much change they are truly going to affect with this new stance, how deep within the organization these principles are embraced and applied, and how committed they will be to them if at some point they no longer make money off of it.
If a company can affect change and make money at the same time, I say good for them. If they are doing good with one hand and doing harm with the other, that’s another story. But I imagine that wholesale societal change likely happens on many levels, and corporate America probably has its role to play in this, which is the role Dove is adopting. And if Dove has decided it’s important enough of an issue to women today to focus on this, that must mean something, right?
It’s unfortunate though that they squash all fantasies of the purity of their message when they finish the ad by imploring that WE should speak to our girls before THEY do. They wash their hands of all responsibility from that point on, and that’s the point where I lose faith in them.
Shaping Youth
October 8, 2007 | 10:36 pm6
I agree…would’ve been nice to tie in a “call to action” as we say in the biz. (rather than dump it on parents’ laps to ‘talk to your daughter”) sheesh—no amount of media deconstruction will erase those images seared into their brain, jangling their synapses 24/7.
Maybe they could’ve concluded with a URL in ‘what you can do’ mode so we wouldn’t all feel so overwhelmed. (e.g. cobranding Dove with the Dads&Daughters advocacy arm, About-Face.org, or for that matter, Shaping Youth could’ve teamed with them as a nonprofit voice with a stronger dissolve, “Is this REALLY how we want to be shaping youth?” And end on our logo for the ‘call to action’ element, “using the power of media for positive change’ to fund our own documentary in development, Body Blitz: Media Shaping Youth” —
But alas, it wasn’t a PSA, it was a paid spot. So not to get on my soapbox, (ahem) but admittedly, Dove’s doin’ a dang good job of getting attention for themselves w/some solid production values and decent budgets/awareness building, profit motive or not…
I hope we can ‘up the ante’ on the messaging next by showing ‘the real thing.’ Documentary, SHOCKumentary, call it what you will…it’s a heckuva reality show…We’re hopin’ it’ll work when folks see the trickle down impact this mess is having on REAL kids in REAL time…no commercial glitz. (But alas, that takes $. In fact it ALL comes down to money. That’s how we got into this mess in the first place..)
Hey, maybe Shaping Youth should start our own UGC video contest w/BlogHer etc. and use social media to compile our ‘evidence’ gleaned from playgrounds? We could invite our readers to send in their best footage to compile in our film from all over the world…kinda like we did with the Age of Conversation book for children’s charity?
That might be a much quicker way to get a global take on this…maybe I’m going about this film funding thing all wrong trying to be ‘SuperSizeMe’ in quality & length & distribution when it could fast forward as a UGC global montage, aired on Current, or QuantumShift.tv or Blip.tv or BlogTV, or YouTube viral video for that matter…or at least use it as a raw, rough-cut trailer for the bigger piece we have in development?!
Hmn. What do you think, ladies?
Bring your video to the playground (or mall) next time and record some behavioral data firsthand. (I can post a prototype talent release…I’d love to see some footage besides mine, from regions around the globe!) Thoughts?
mypeSpubtep
November 1, 2008 | 5:37 pm7
Emm.. Sometimes I can’t help but show you my dizzy input I have read a good joke in internet
Why did Robin Hood rob only the rich? Because the poor had no money.
Still defending Dove (now please send me free stuff) « blue milk
October 26, 2007 | 6:03 am8
[...] I actually discovered through her post on that ad. It has been really interesting to see how feminists have variously responded to this advertisement. Make no mistake, ‘Onslaught’ is an advertisement, it it trying to sell products to [...]
Seiko Champion » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Branding Lessons
November 27, 2007 | 1:11 am9
[...] the real lesson, and unfortunate truth, is that they are simply out to sell more product, and as one women states well: no matter what we’re out here saying - this film is circulating like wildfire and I didn’t [...]